Improving Processes & Services

lindsay sherwin logo

OverviewTools & TechniquesCustomer ServiceLeading the Project

Customer Service

bullet Three Service Dimensions

bullet Analysing the Package
bullet Performance Factors
bullet Journey of the Customer
bullet Journey HealthCheck
bullet Survey Techniques
bullet Types of Interviews
bullet Survey Tools

© Copyright 2007
Lindsay Sherwin

Click here to access the Lindsay Sherwin Homepage and further toolkits.

 

Customer Surveys - techniques

Typically, there are three techniques to use when carrying out a customer survey - Interviews, Focus Groups, and Questionnaires. Each is suited to particular situations and the following tables summarises when they are best used and their pros and cons.

 

When to Use

Pros and Cons

Interviews
  • When individuals interviewed have considerable expertise in a subject matter.
  • When the targeted population is small and/or dispersed.
  • To get in-depth understanding of how work is conducted.
  • To get in-depth thoughts or opinions of key individuals.
  • To get/give information and gain commitment to a course of action.
  1. Are personalised
  2. Offer flexibility
  3. Yield rich data
  4. Can be arranged quickly
  1. Can be costly
  2. Are tedious to analyse
  3. Requires skilled interviewer
Focus Groups
  • To hear the voice of the customer in a group setting.
  • To get at the underlying attitudes and feelings.
  • To gather information from many people, when money and time are limited.
  • To use customers as a "sounding-board" for safely exploring ideas.
  1. Ensures that all critical issues are covered.
  2. Gives "why" as well as" what"
  3. Yield rich data
  4. Can be arranged quickly
  1. Can be costly
  2. Are tedious to analyse
  3. Requires skilled moderator
Questionnaire Surveys
  • To do a quantitative analysis.
  • To gather information that is representative of a large population, or from a specific large number of individuals.
  • When face-to-face meetings with respondents are difficult, impossible, or undesirable.
  1. Are efficient
  2. Ensures standardisation of data.
  1. Danger of "garbage in - garbage out"
  2. Response rate cannot be guaranteed
  3. Interpretation affects results